- ERP.Aero Insider by Ralph
- Posts
- The Illusion of Efficiency: How Companies Survive on Burnout Without Even Realizing It
The Illusion of Efficiency: How Companies Survive on Burnout Without Even Realizing It
The Truth No One Talks About—But Everyone Feels
Imagine this.
You’re sitting at your desk, staring at an inbox flooded with RFQs. There are too many to get through, and you already know that some of them—maybe the best ones—will slip through the cracks. But what choice do you have? You do what you always do: copy, paste, double-check numbers, and move on to the next. It’s inefficient, but you’ve made it work. Because that’s what’s expected of you.
Now, step into the shoes of leadership. Your team is grinding away, and from your seat, you see two outcomes:
The job got done.
The job didn’t get done.
That’s it. No one brings you the full story. No one tells you how many RFQs were missed, how much extra effort went into hitting the numbers, or how many people are one bad week away from quitting.
And that’s the problem.
Across aviation—and beyond—companies are running on invisible inefficiencies. Teams are burning hours on workarounds because no one is truly listening to them. Leaders are making decisions without understanding the real cost of getting the job done. Managers are caught in between, trying to hold it all together. The chaos continues, and no one stops to ask:
How much money are we leaving on the table?
How many employees are grinding themselves into burnout just to keep up?
How much of our "success" is actually just survival?
If you’re reading this, you’ve felt it.
Maybe you’re the one drowning in manual work, trying to keep things from falling apart. Maybe you’re the leader who knows something isn’t quite right, but no one’s giving you the full picture. Maybe you’re stuck in between, seeing the problems but feeling powerless to fix them.
This isn’t just about aviation. This is what happens when companies operate in silos, when departments work around problems instead of solving them, and when leaders don’t ask the right questions.
So today, let’s ask them.
What’s really happening in your business?
What’s the cost of doing things the way they’ve always been done?
And more importantly—how much longer can you afford to ignore it?
The Everyday Struggle That No One Admits
Let me tell you about a conversation I had recently.
A distributor, drowning in RFQs, sat across from me. For 40 minutes, they opened up about the constant pressure—too many RFQs, not enough time, and the sinking feeling that opportunities were slipping away.
But when it came time to talk solutions, they shut down.
"I’m good," he said. "I use ___ as my ERP. We also have ___ for all our RFQs.”
And then, without hesitation, he added:
"Oh and we have lot of spreadsheets,"
That was the moment.
Not a second of doubt. No embarrassment. Just total acceptance that spreadsheets were part of the process, in addition to two services (that do the same thing). Because for them, this wasn’t a broken system—it was just “how things are.”
And that was it. It seemed as if fear had won. Not logic. Not strategy. Fear.
Why? Because change is hard. Because when you’re used to just barely keeping up, even a better way can feel like a risk.
But here’s the part that everyone needs to hear, from leadership to end-users and everyone in between: This isn’t just about one person. This is happening across your entire organization.
End users are buried in inefficiencies, but no one is listening, so they build their own workarounds.
Managers are stuck trying to make it all work, balancing pressure from above and frustration from below.
Leadership sees the numbers at the end of the quarter—but they never ask, at what cost?
How many RFQs were missed? How much money was left on the table? How many hours were wasted fighting with disconnected systems? So when I asked what is the current process? The answers were crazy scary:
"Right now, we’re doing this step manually, …”
and
"We have to revalidate the quotation manually by copying and pasting the part numbers..."
In short, hey needed an ERP to do ERP things, they needed a second service to manage their Inventory Locator Service,® LLC , PartsBase Inc. , and Locatory.com traffic, and the spreadsheets to keep them all as updated as possible.
And the most important question of all: How much of your success is built on people burning themselves out just to keep up?
We’ve talked about the frustration. The daily grind of trying to keep up. The missed opportunities that everyone feels but no one fully admits.
Now, let’s put numbers to it.
Because this isn’t just an inconvenience—it’s a massive financial leak that’s draining companies across aviation, manufacturing, and beyond.
1. The Financial Impact of Missed RFQs, and Mismanaged Inventory
Let’s assume a distributor receives 100 RFQs per day. If they’re operating manually—spread across an ERP, a quoting tool, and spreadsheets—what happens?
Even the best teams can’t respond to everything. If 20% of RFQs go unanswered, that’s 20 potential sales gone every single day.
Slow responses kill deals. In aviation, speed matters. If a competitor responds first, you’re out. Even a 10% delay in response time could mean millions in lost sales annually.
The compound effect is staggering. If a company misses just 5 RFQs per day due to inefficiencies, and each RFQ averages $5,000 in potential revenue, that’s $25,000 per day in lost opportunities. Over a year? $9.1 million.
Now, ask yourself: How much is inefficiency costing your business?
2. The Silent Drain on Labor Costs
Inefficiency isn’t just about sales—it’s about time.
Think about how long it actually takes to process an RFQ manually considering all the marketplaces, service and platforms, and spreadsheets.
An employee receives an RFQ and copies details into their ERP (5-10 minutes).
They switch to their quoting tool to check pricing, availability, and lead time (5-15 minutes).
If those systems don’t sync, they manually update spreadsheets to track quotes (another 5-10 minutes).
If there’s a mistake? They go back and fix it.
That’s 20-30 minutes per RFQ, minimum. If they handle 30 RFQs per day, that’s 15 hours per day lost to manual work—nearly two full-time employees’ worth of time just moving data around.
And what does that lead to?
Employee burnout. Repetitive, high-stakes manual work leads to stress, mistakes, and frustration.
High turnover. Good people leave when they feel unheard and overwhelmed.
Hidden costs. Every new hire means lost productivity, training costs, and more instability.
If leadership only sees that “the job got done” but never asks how much effort it really took, the cycle continues.
3. The Chaos Multiplies—And No One Knows Who to Blame
This is where the breakdown gets even worse.
Executives see the numbers and wonder why growth is slowing.
Managers are fighting to keep everything from collapsing.
End users are stuck in the middle, doing whatever it takes to get the job done.
Everyone’s frustrated, but no one is fixing the real problem.
Instead of addressing the root cause—disconnected systems, inefficiencies, outdated processes—companies add more people, throw in another tool, or demand better performance.
But the issue was never the people.
It was the process.
And until that’s addressed, the cycle of wasted time, missed revenue, and employee frustration continues.
Two Stories, Two Outcomes
Story 1: The Company That Ignored the Warning Signs
“We’ve always done it this way.”
That was the response from a mid-sized aviation distributor when their operations manager pushed for change. They had been manually handling RFQs for years, using a mix of ERP software, a quoting subscription, and Excel sheets. Their process wasn’t great, but it worked—at least, that’s what they told themselves.
Here’s what was happening behind the scenes:
RFQs were sitting unanswered because the team was too overwhelmed to process them all.
Customers were moving on to faster competitors.
Employees were exhausted from juggling multiple systems, constantly checking and rechecking data for accuracy.
The leadership team only saw two things: orders were still being processed, and revenue looked stable. What they didn’t see?
A growing backlog of unprocessed RFQs—meaning potential sales that never even made it to the pipeline.
High turnover in the sales team, leading to constant hiring and training costs.
Longer response times that slowly pushed customers toward competitors who could deliver quotes faster.
The breaking point?
They lost a $5M+ account. The customer didn’t leave because of pricing or service quality—they left because they weren’t getting responses fast enough. One RFQ, too slow, and the entire relationship unraveled.
The company scrambled to recover, but by then, the damage was done. They were forced to rethink everything—but only after losing a key customer, multiple employees, and millions in revenue.
Story 2: The Company That Fixed the Problem—Before It Was Too Late
Now, let’s talk about another company, roughly the same size, facing the same problem.
Unlike the first company, they made a different choice.
After seeing their RFQ response times slipping and their sales team constantly working overtime, they took a step back and asked the right questions:
Why are our teams struggling?
What’s taking so much time?
How many RFQs are we actually missing?
When they looked closer, reality hit hard. They were spending hours just moving data between systems. Sales reps were spending more time manually updating spreadsheets than actually selling.
The CEO made a decision: No more patchwork fixes. No more temporary workarounds.
They streamlined their RFQ process by integrating their tools, automating data entry, and reducing the number of steps required to send a quote. No extra headcount, no expensive “digital transformation” project—just smart automation and system alignment.
What happened?
RFQ response time dropped from 24-48 hours to under 2 hours.
Sales increased by 17% in six months—without hiring a single new person.
Employee turnover dropped because people weren’t drowning in busywork anymore.
And the best part? Customers noticed.
By responding faster, they won deals their competitors never even got a chance to quote.
The Takeaway: Which Company Are You?
Every company faces inefficiencies. The difference is who’s willing to fix them before they turn into real losses.
If you’re reading this, you’re either:
✅ A leader who’s unaware of how much time, money, and talent is being wasted.
✅ A manager trying to hold it all together, feeling the pressure from both sides.
✅ An end user who knows exactly how broken the system is but feels unheard.
The question isn’t whether these inefficiencies exist in your company.
The question is: How much longer can you afford to ignore them?
Shifting the Mindset: The Cost of Inaction is Greater Than the Cost of Change
By now, you see it.
The inefficiencies, the missed opportunities, the silent costs that don’t show up on a single line item—but are bleeding your company dry. Maybe you’ve even felt that uncomfortable realization creeping in: This is happening to us.
So, what now?
Do you close this article, shake your head, and go back to the same daily grind? Do you convince yourself that things aren’t that bad—that your team will just “work harder” to make up for the cracks in the system?
Or do you finally acknowledge the truth?
Inefficiency isn’t just a nuisance. It’s a competitive threat.
The companies that refuse to change will lose to the ones that do. And the brutal reality? Some of them already have.
Here’s the mindset shift: Doing nothing is a decision.
And it’s the most expensive one you can make.
Because inefficiency isn’t static—it compounds. Every day that a slow RFQ process continues, every time a team manually transfers data between systems, every lost deal that goes unnoticed… it all adds up.
Let’s put it in real terms:
If you’re missing just 5 RFQs a day due to inefficiencies, that’s over 1,800 lost opportunities per year. How much is that worth in revenue?
If it takes your team 20 minutes to manually process an RFQ and they handle 30 per day, that’s 600 wasted hours per month. That’s the equivalent of three full-time employees doing nothing but moving data.
If you have high turnover because your best people are sick of the chaos, you’re losing more than just employees—you’re losing experience, relationships, and momentum.
And here’s the real kicker: Your competitors are figuring this out right now.
The companies that embrace efficiency—those that fix their processes, integrate their systems, and stop relying on outdated workarounds—aren’t just making small improvements. They’re pulling away.
They’re responding faster. Winning more business. Keeping their best people.
And if you’re not doing the same?
They’re taking your customers while you’re still “thinking about it.”
What’s Your Breaking Point?
Every company eventually hits a moment where the cost of inefficiency becomes unavoidable.
For some, it’s a massive lost deal—one that leadership can’t ignore. For others, it’s the departure of key employees, frustrated with doing more work than necessary. Sometimes, it’s as simple as realizing that revenue isn’t growing—not because of market conditions, but because of internal friction.
Ask yourself:
Are you willing to lose millions in opportunities before making a change?
How many more times will your team be forced to “just figure it out” before they burn out?
How much longer will you let old processes dictate your company’s future?
If the answers make you uncomfortable, good. That means you see the truth.
No More Excuses. No More Delays. It’s Time to Act.
You’ve seen the truth. You can’t unsee it.
Now comes the hardest part—the part that separates those who win from those who get left behind.
The choice.
Are you going to be the company that stays stuck, watching competitors pull ahead, losing deals and talent while you scramble to keep up? Or are you going to wake up, take control, and fix the problem before it buries you? Download the ERP checklist.
Because here’s the thing:
❌ There is no more "just getting by."
❌ Your competition isn’t waiting for you to figure it out.
❌ The cost of doing nothing is already hitting your bottom line.
🚨 So here’s the real question: 🚨
Are you going to let fear win?
Or are you going to take the first step?
If it’s the latter, download you, download The Smart Way to Maximize Aviation Margins.
Here’s What You Do Next
You don’t need a five-year transformation plan. You don’t need endless meetings.
You need to start so we’ve designed a simple and easy process:
Rip the Band-Aid off.
The Ones Who Act Will Win. The Rest Will Be Left Behind.
And in the next 12 months, the companies who fix their inefficiencies will pull ahead for good.
Which side of that do you want to be on?
Your move.
Reply